Here’s a media release today from the Environmental Defence Society regarding a consent granted to TAG Oil to commence activities in Gisborne. Makes pretty clear how this company does the very best it can … to operate outside of effective public scrutiny.
Welcome to the big time oil biz, East Coast.
GISBORNE DISTRICT COUNCIL DECISION TO GRANT TAG OIL/APACHE CORPORATION OIL CONSENTS FLAWED
Gisborne District Council has granted resource consents to TAG Oil and Apache Corporation for site establishment works for a drilling platform on a property in Te Karaka. The application was not publicly notified and the Council decided not to defer the decision until it received related applications for the exploratory drilling which are expected.
“The consented activities are clearly stage one of a petroleum exploration activity. The site will be of no value to the applicants if they do not gain consent for drilling activities,” said EDS Chairman Gary Taylor.
“The RMA allows Councils to defer considering a consent application until all consents required for the proposal are received. It is best practice for all required consents for an activity to be identified from the outset, applied for contemporaneously and considered together. This ensures that all environmental effects can be taken into account in deciding whether consents should be granted.
“If the applicants are allowed to apply for resource consents incrementally this can mean that later consents are granted based on the baseline created by the earlier consent. This is a piecemeal approach.
“By splitting things up like this, the applicants are effectively gaming the system to make it easier for them to get consent for exploration drilling.
“We are concerned that this practice seems be spreading with oil exploration companies adopting the same approach elsewhere in the country.
“We also note that the Gisborne District Council has decided to grant the resource consents on a non-notified basis, excluding even immediate neighbours from having a say. This ignores the clear evidence of visual, traffic and noise effects.
“If the decision on notification had been deferred until all the consent applications had been received it is likely the Council would have decided to notify.
“EDS is extremely concerned about the approach taken by both the applicant and the Gisborne District Council and we are looking at potential legal action.
“We are not opposed to oil exploration but we really want to see these large international companies like TAG Oil playing fair and doing things properly,” Mr Taylor concluded.
Apache seem to have done the same thing down in Dannevirke with Horizions. I also suspect consents are only being applied for piecemeal in Taranaki so that the effects of one consent (when considered in isolation) will not be more than minor.
Why are there so many restrictions on developing our resources?
If this had been the attitude in the past NZ would never have been developed. All the settlers would have had to have gone back to England because some ancient environment court in NZ would have decided that cutting down trees and developing farms would have caused too much environmental destruction.
The reality is that Oil is biodegradable and the environmental footprint when drilling for Oil is minimal
Telling it like it is
You ask, 'Why are there so many restrictions on developing our resources?'
I don't know much about oil but since you mention cutting down trees consider for example our kauri forests;
'….of the estimated 1,215,000 hectares in the original kauri forest,only about 142 hectares remain' (Native Trees of New Zealand,Prof JT Salmon 1980)
IE, we cut down 99.988% ( Check my math(s))
Is that too much environmental destruction for you??
And, why hide? Use your name.
Giving away our resources to overseas conglomerates in exchange for a permanent shaft (radioactive, rotting, leaking pipes stuck into our land rendering it useless forever more) is arguably not the same thing as "Developing our resources"