This week, at our Wednesday meeting, Regional Councillors will be asked to set in motion a public consultation process regarding ratepayer investment in the CHB dam.

Here’s what we are expected by HBRC management to base our decision on:

1. A so-called ‘business case’ tabled by HBRIC, the holding company team promoting the scheme. What Councillors (and the public) have seen is a ‘business case’ with no supporting numbers regarding cash flows, sensitivity analyses of differing assumptions or risks, or investment returns. Indeed at this point it is not clear if there even are any investors.

When HBRIC presented its case, I offered a motion, which was ruled out of order, that listed the information we Councillors needed to see and review so as to appropriately evaluate any potential ratepayer investment. I’ve attached the failed motion here.

Call me crazy, but don’t you believe this is the kind of information you would expect me and other Councillors to have and weigh? In fact, shouldn’t such information be available to you?

2. The so-called ‘Nimmo-Bell’ report on alternative investments HBRC might consider to advance economic development goals for the region. This report was so hastily prepared, devoid of information, and lacking in analytic rigour that it was ridiculed by some Councillors, while others apologised to the hapless consultant for giving his team an impossible task. I termed it a ‘fool’s errand’. Even at that, the report concluded that the economic benefits of the scheme — jobs, GDP growth, etc — had been over-stated in HBRIC studies by 20%.

3. And now on Wednesday we are scheduled to receive a verbal ‘interim report’ — that’s right, a verbal report — from our other consultants, Deloitte, who have been charged with giving Councillors (and the public) an independent peer review of the HBRIC ‘business case’. In other words, we’re getting a verbal report reviewing a business case Councillors have yet to see in any reasonable detail!

On the basis of our insights from the above, Councillors will be asked on Wednesday to endorse commencement of a public consultation process that, technically, would test public views on HBRC investing up to $80 million in the proposed dam, but effectively will serve as the public test of proceeding with a $600 million, all in, irrigation scheme in Central Hawke’s Bay.

It would seem that HBRIC and our Regional Council chaperones are determined for Councillors to be as uninformed as possible in making this decision. Do we have ‘STUPID’ stamped on our foreheads or what?!

Indeed, this process has all the elements of a brilliant case study for the Auditor General … How NOT to make a $600 million decision!

I know that some Councillors take our fiduciary duty seriously. They believe as firmly as I do that this process is a travesty. We will do our best to ensure that we and the public are far better informed before we make any kind of decision regarding whether this proposal deserves to go forward to public consultation.

Tom Belford

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

  1. I cannot see any value in a verbal report…interim or not…and surprised Deloitte’s would even consider doing this. How Councillors could possibly go along with this is also surprising…staggering would be more appropriate.

    This fiasco is another good case for amalgamation.

    Laurie

  2. The verbal presentation of Deloitte’s peer review is standard behaviour for our Regional Council & it’s investment company, both of which operate on the basis of ‘what is the minimum we can get away with?”
    A real concern is that Councillors will be asked on Wednesday to approve “statement of proposal” for public consultation. That proposal does not include any information as per Tom’s 1) above. (apparently, we all have STUPID stamped on our forehead!)
    An $80,000 budget for promoting ‘input to consultation’ will ensure we hear,see, and read of the fabulous projected benefits, but non of the facts – especially not risks!
    For those who agree that this is totally unacceptable, do action an email to your own, or every, elected councillor telling them just that. You can, indeed, make a difference…. Well, let’s see!

  3. Maybe it’s time for “Someone” to sack the HBRC Council and install a Commissioner ….A LA the HB Hospital Board a few years ago, as it is becoming abundantly clear that there is a “Them” versus “Us” faction developing within the HBRC, and that the Chairman is going to build this Dam no matter what Hurdles are put up in front of him, and it appears that he has the
    “Elevensies Cult” to do so.
    HB Home Owners be warned, we are heading for a massive debt to hang above our heads, and we will be responsible for paying for it no matter what your circumstances are, like it or lump it.

  4. Tom, I have seen this movie too many times.
    In the case of the aquarium, Cr Dick [ then mayor of Napier] totally disregarded a council commissioned report that demonstrated how the gamble would be a disaster for the ratepayers and pushed through the project–with the assistance of Cr Pipe.
    It now costs the city over $600,000 in annual losses !
    Cr Pipe, while a NCC councillor totally disregarded all officer and independent reports as to the losses that the Napier ratepayers would be faced with both the dud Deco buses and the museum.
    And you expect these two to pay any attention whatsoever to their fiduciary duty to their ratepayers ?
    The Office of the Auditor General should be bought in by concerned councillors IMMEDIATLY and NOT after the horse has bolted.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *