Hastings mayoral and council seat candidate Steve Gibson specialises in innuendo, as I reported here.

His favourite slap at HDC has made it into his official Voter Guide Profile. Very simply, he says “No” to “incompetence like buying the Assembly of God building for $1 million and selling it for $150,000.”
Now indeed that’s factually correct, almost; it was sold for $155,000. But seriously, there’s a much bigger story around this transaction, which was designed to – and in fact delivered – an award-winning answer to one of Hastings’ most vexing problems … homelessness.
Statements like Gibson’s in his Profile statement are unvetted, so candidates can say anything they want so long as they keep to 150 words. Yet they appear as gospel in every single ballot envelope, which in far too many cases is the only source of reference for voters about the candidates.
For that reason, a misleading statement like Gibson’s deserves calling out. And especially in his case, because for him this isn’t a one-off, it’s emblematic of his entire campaign strategy – making unsubstantiated claims about council ‘misdeeds’ and persisting in them despite official refutation.
So here’s the full story on the “incompetent sale”.
With enthusiastic public support, HDC – using council and government funding, as well as generous private contributions – has spawned a cultural, meeting, entertainment and hotel complex on Heretaunga Street East that most in the city are quite proud of and many frequent.
But plopped in the middle of this – at 305 Heretaunga St East – was the Assembly of God (AOG) mission, attempting to provide respite for the homeless in a dilapidated building they owned (as Hastings Church). Not the ideal activity for the neighbourhood, but making an effort to deal with a very serious social challenge that HDC was also determined to address.
HDC gathered together various parties, including Anglican Diocese, Presbyterian Church, Hastings Church and others to identify a relocation plan that would progress both objectives – enabling more appropriate development of the Heretaunga Street precinct and providing a better facility to provide pastoral care for the district’s homeless.
With those goals aligned, HDC purchased the AOG building in 2022 for $1 million, an amount significantly less than originally sought by the Church, with the intention of redeveloping it. The proceeds of the sale enabled Hastings Church to move their operation and establish what is now known as Kuhu Mai – a much-needed homelessness service providing pastoral care including health services and support for addiction.
Initially Council investigated plans to repurpose its site as an addition to Toitoi. However, as Council’s financial position had changed significantly post-Gabrielle, disposal versus redevelopment became the preferred option, but still seeking an outcome that aligned with enhancing the city centre.
Over about a year, Council officers met with a number of developers and investors potentially interested in purchasing 305 Heretaunga Street East. Conditional offers were received – the highest being $600,000, subject to the purchaser’s due diligence and Council approval. However with adverse due diligence outcomes, none progressed, predominately because of the investment required for asbestos removal and to meet structural strengthening requirements. No formal offer to purchase was realised.
Finally, in June 2024 Council received two offers, one for $100,000 and another for $155,000. Council subsequently agreed to sell to Wallace Development for $155,000, with key conditions including the retention of the on-street façade. The resource consent has been issued for the work that Wallace Development proposes to undertake with a national tenant.
In a statement to BayBuzz, HDC comments: “We strongly refute any notion of corruption or underhandedness with these property transactions. Council purchased the building with broader outcomes in mind. Those outcomes were achieved with the creation of Kuhu Mai, and the subsequent sale price was supported by market evidence, and based on no development opportunities with a sale price higher than what was achieved.”
As for Kuhu Mai, the programme now located at St Andrew’s Hall and led by Warren and Sarah Heke is currently serving about 170 homeless people, with many of those now receiving medical care for the first time in ages. A report by Impact Lab covering the period 1 Aug 2022 – 30 April 2023 calculated the hub had generated a total social value of $2,636,432, with a social value per person engaged of $22,728. It’s won national award recognition from Local Government NZ.

About 18 months ago, Stuff journalist Marty Sharpe wrote this thorough article on the inspiring Kuhu Mai homeless programme, bringing that dollar analysis to life.
Nevertheless, as candidate Steve Gibson tells it, this is simply an incompetent transaction, possibly bordering on corruption.
This is the candidate Gibson I watched stand before hundreds at a candidates forum last week and say Hastings had no homelessness problem (actually characterising these people as simply beggars who had homes but preferred the street) and argue, in any event, this wasn’t the council’s business.
This is the candidate Gibson who as owner of two motels in Napier in recent years, has received over $1 million per year in government payments to provide emergency housing to the homeless. Perfectly legitimate, just a bit hypocritical.
Personally, I regard this whole episode as an admirable win-win story for Hastings – enabling both a welcome opportunity to further improve Hastings’ cultural precinct and, via HDC leadership, a hugely enhanced opportunity to address a pressing social problem for which the community cannot avoid ownership.
But, if you share the view that Hastings Council has no business trying to enable effective care for its homeless population, then candidate Gibson is your man. And you’ll probably enjoy his other anecdotes too.


Thanks Tom. It is refreshing to see this level of journalistic analysis to counter disinformation spread by those hoping to benefit from the prevailing narratives of (older, white*), entitlement, racism, and anti-intellectualism.
(Oh for more media engagement like this with disinformation at a central government level, and closer scrutiny of what astroturf third-party organisations like the TPU are up to.)
Local government faces difficult decisions every day – and if mayoral candidates can’t understand nuance, compassion, pragmatism, and governance for *all*, they most definitely shouldn’t be standing.
* PS I fit in the ‘older, white’ basket myself. We’re not all like that!
Thanks, Wanda. If that was true, where is the write up on the other candidates and their ‘dirty’ secrets. It’s all right there for a ‘journalist’ to find. Current mayors buying votes through their companies, current councillors voting on decisions that favour their businesses and directors being appointed to CCOs with questionable allegiances and backgrounds. Haven’t seen any of that published, Tom. Feel free to drive me wrong and do it!
Kia ora Lead, or is that ‘Mr Balloon’? I’m not entirely sure of the point you’re getting at, are you alleging fraud committed by one or several of the other candidates? It would be fascinating to hear more details and I’m sure Tom and his staff would be delighted to delve into these as they have into Mr
Gibson (so to speak)! With thanks, Wanda
Ms Thorndike, it appears Lead Balloon has asked the journalist to do his research. Was that what he did on Steve Gibson, or, as Lead Balloon states, is he also part of the questionable group currently in power. Tom, as a journalist, you, as we all know, can choose to be objective or subjective. Your choice based on this article is very clear. If you would like to show us otherwise, be our guests. As Lead Balloon says, it’s all out there for the taking, you just have to seek and you will find. Freedom of the press and all that.
Hmm, ‘Seek’ it’s all very well to cast dark aspersions with zero evidence to back them up, although I totally support your right to do so. We’ve seen a lot of this over the last few years, after all, and it seems to have become accepted discourse. Hence Mr Gibson’s right of entry to the mayoral contest, I expect.
What exactly do you want to know more about? Is that a conspiracy theory I spy (‘is he [Tom] part of the questionable group currently in power’?) because if so, it fits with the dark aspersions strategy- ie at this point, unsubstantiated. Glued to my iPad screen right now while I await the next instalment.
Mr Gibson is absolutely arrogant. Don’t get my vote bro
The BayBuzz team don’t muck around with articles, investigative journalism at its finest.
Spot on Allus, I’ve always found it refreshing there is at least one journalist in the bay that cares enough to dig into more that just social media posts for a news story and it was nice to actually get some insight into the sale of this building.
Also agree that the arrogance of most of these candidates is so off putting. I think the only one worse than Gibson is Buddo. I friend told me about his performance at one of the debates talking about he is the only one that has got the skills and done all the work and all the others are incompetent. Pretty cocky for someone I had never heard of before his face started popping up around town. They all need to grow up and realise that kind of crap doesn’t actually sit well with the voters. Although it does make it easy to narrow down who to vote for
Oh, so HDC didn’t get a Lim report. Really, don’t the people doing building inspection work for the Council? This is sloppy at best and ratepayers should expect better.
The condition was known. The challenge to HDC as purchaser was a reluctant seller.
Great job Tom, our hugely un-equal society needs social services for those not so fortunate. If only people of Mr. Gibson’s ilk would pay fair tax on their capital gains and other windfall profits our (coalition) Government could do a much better job. Instead of leaving it to charities. Good on ya HDC.
HDC, corrupt, corrupt, corrupt. Tom continues to support. Why? As a former Councillor yourself Tom, I myself question everything you write and who is paying your bill.
Yes, I was a HB Regional Councillor, two terms. I do understand how councils work.
That said, VERY few have found me too soft on councils over the last 15+ years.
My support? Check the advertisers in BayBuzz magazine, NONE of whom are there because they endorse everything BayBuzz says.
despite disagreeing with some of the stances and ,indeed, comments that Tom Belford makes I can vouch for his absolute journalistic integrity…..it’s good to see articles like these on mayoral hopeful, Steve Gibson, being given the ‘light of day’….like it or not…information is king…so now you know, wotcha gonna do about it ?
Not sure which “light” Tom was trying to refer to.
The real facts are clear: Council lost $845,000 on a property deal and no candidate except Steve Gibson has called them out. Add to that the extra 100 staff hired in the past four years to service vanity projects that cost millions every year to run.
Meanwhile, Council keeps defending its 19% and 15% rate hikes by blaming the cyclone. Yeah, right. Ratepayers know full well that waste and mismanagement are driving the pain.
If voters choose another current councillor as Mayor, they’ll get exactly what they deserve, more excuses, more waste, higher rates and more debt.
At least Steve Gibson is standing for real change: a complete restructure of Council and a return to true accountability.
What terrible journalism.
Tom is now justifying Council throwing away $845,000 on a failed property deal by claiming the AOG spent the money on the homeless. What about the pensioners on fixed incomes who were hit with a 15% rates hike to cover Council’s mistakes?
Tom also took Steve out of context. When Steve said “some homeless,” he was clearly referring to Allerton Council flat residents who file out to the main road pretending to be homeless in the hope of better begging. Yet Tom twists it to sound like Steve was targeting all vulnerable people.
Then Tom slams Steve for helping the homeless by opening his motel to them. Sure, he was paid for it — but does that mean he should be cut down for being a successful businessman? That seems to be the Kiwi way these days: attack achievement instead of acknowledging someone stepped up to help.
And as for the woke commentator eager to score points, they clearly need a history lesson. No doubt they baited Steve in the hope of twisting his answers too.
https://x.com/i/status/1968174088150716434
Enjoying the election articles Tom.
Anyone who opportunistically raped the government coffers ( and thereby our tax dollars) by converting their motels to emergency housing doesn’t deserve to sit on the council, much less get a chance to be mayor. Some got rich very quickly! I personally know stories where people were told to go to MSD with kids in the car together with all their belongings and say that they were living in their cars and homeless and had no where else to go. They would be sent to a motel – $165 a day minimum for the motel for a single room.
Thanks, Wayne or Kerry. I’m sure Steve’s opinions struck a nerve with you.
https://www.companyhub.nz/companyDetails.cfm?nzbn=9429033038049
Thanks for your personal opinions, and here’s one for you, when the pot calls the kettle black, the pot is usually the one with the secrets in their web. Enjoy the feedback.
Thanks for the details about the original intention behind the purchase and sale of the building where I was invited to attend a community meeting to address homelessness in Hastings a few years ago. Everyone there was engaged in providing social support services and was invited to work together. I admired the philanthropy and goodwill in the room and appreciated learning about the positive outcome in this story.