Hastings Councillor Steve Gibson is a master of presenting two faces. Kind of a Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde.
Here’s a recent Facebook post from Dr Jekyll-Gibson:
“One of the most basic rules of good governance is this: you do not borrow to fund day to day operations.
“Borrowing for operational costs is how councils lose control of their finances. It shifts today’s bills onto tomorrow’s ratepayers and locks communities into an ongoing cycle of debt that only gets worse over time.
“Yet in Hastings, we are being asked to do exactly that. Borrowing money not for long term infrastructure, but to cover this year’s operational shortfall. That means pushing the burden onto next year’s ratepayers and beyond.
“That is not responsible. That is simply delaying the problem and making it bigger for the future.
“Far better to find operational savings and keep rate rises affordable like I have and will continue to stand up for our ratepayers!”
Now, someone with knowledge of HDC’s finances might argue that the situation is more nuanced, or defend the Council’s position, or challenge Councillor Gibson to identify the savings he would capture, and so on.
But there’s nothing objectionable about pushing for cost savings versus borrowing. It’s simply a proposition to examine on its merits.
And if this were all you ever heard from Councillor Gibson, you might well be inclined to cheer him on as your long-awaited saviour for rates reduction.
However … hold off on your adulation and
There’s clearly a quite disturbing side to Mr Hyde-Gibson, which frequently emerges when he switches agendas and reveals his underlying value set. That’s what happened in a recent interview with podcaster Duncan Garner.
The most startling of Gibson’s comments were these, characterising his ‘colleagues’ at the Hastings District Council:
“But the problem with council, it is full of middle aged woke women, and they’re running the show. You’ve got demasculated (sic) males surrounding them that won’t stand up because they’re afraid of being called a racist or a sexist.”
He goes on to characterise Māori as camels sneaking nose-first into the tent:
“And this carries on and camel’s inside the tent, and pushes the mate out of the tent. And, you know, keep giving an inch. And then Māori will eventually take over everything, and they’ll be charging us for water.”
You can watch the podcast yourself here, or read this transcript, to get a full flavour of Councillor Gibson … before you award him your unreserved respect, admiration and Facebook accolade.
Personally, I can engage with Dr Jekyll-Gibson … no problem with reasonable debate over the wisdom or efficacy of any council’s priorities, programmes and spending. But Mr Hyde-Gibson is another entirely distasteful matter.
Having chatted with Councillor Gibson, I don’t think he really cares that his more rabid comments and sulking demeanour actually preclude any prospect he might have of generating change, whatever the merits of any of his views. So heaps of posturing, but no results … other than letting down his supporters, some of whom might prefer constructive action.
But why worry about having no impact, this term? His dual persona works just fine for generating Facebook likes and soaking up disaffected votes. And maybe well enough to get elected mayor next time.
That contest would present a real test of values in the Hastings District.


I’ve said it before on this platform – I don’t like Mr Gibson, his outlook, his attitude towards particular groups such as Maori and Women, and his petulant behaviour. The thought that he could become Mayor of Hastings is abhorrent – it would bring “Trump” politics and comment into the area and destroy any unity among the people of Hastings – I don’t like him and I don’t trust him. Sorry if you feel differently but his petulant outbursts appall me.
Hasting council is one of the worst in the country, there was an article on BayBuzz about the numbers employed and the size of wages. Was is 1700 between the three councils NCC, HBRC and HDC. I think the old boring men are the way to go, thats as someone who wants lower rates and a return to core services. The reality is eventually we won’t be able to afford our councils. When households default on rates, the wheels come off. Already councils in NZ have had a credit downgrade. Interest rates are going the wrong way, debt is getting expensive and HBC has lots of it. Jobs are leaving the district, growth has stalled or is in reverse. Councils have the look people get when spending other peoples money, be nice to have more accountability.
We are still in cyclone recovery. Infrastructure is under strain. Economic signals are weak, and regions like ours feel it first.
These aren’t isolated issues — they’re one system. In New Zealand, when one part slows, the whole country feels it. That’s exactly why councils need to operate with a systems-thinking lens: focus on resilience, infrastructure, and enabling jobs.
Which is why it’s unacceptable to see council time diverted into divisive sideshows that don’t move any of these issues forward.
Governance is about contribution. Capability matters. Focus matters. When those aren’t brought to the table, it doesn’t just slow progress — it becomes a handbrake on it.
And let’s be clear on the democratic reality: the council direction isn’t ambiguous. It’s 13–2. The vast majority of elected members reflect where the community wants to go. That mandate matters.
Respecting that doesn’t mean silence — it means reading the room and working constructively within it. If you can’t do that, you’re not challenging the system — you’re undermining its ability to function.
This isn’t about personalities. It’s about outcomes.
Right now, our region needs leadership that is serious about recovery, infrastructure, and economic resilience — not rhetoric that distracts from it.
Because we don’t have time to waste.
Couldn’t agree more. Great work exposing Gibson’s duplicity. Thank goodness right wing platforms like Garner’s podcast aren’t censored by the likes of the BSA so misogynist racists expose themselves.
i think the difference between the Jekyll Gibson and the Hyde Gibson is that his PR is carefully written by a pro, his off-the-cuff stuff is clearly sub-sub-pro. which is where he really lurks. like McGrath in Napier, these racist morons got elected by a conservative subset (Brethren? fat farmers? Hobson’s Pledge? all 3) who went out of their way to back them as their puppets. and, as usual, many ordinary voters were fooled into going along, without due diligence. which shows how easy it is to manipulate local elections if you’re a concerted minority with money.
I would agree that they’re puppets. Wondering whether they’re ACT puppets?
Why bring the conversation down to such a level. I would fit his ‘fat farmers’ group if I was buying into such insults, but it is soo ignorant to reduce the argument to this level.
You’ve got no idea, Tom. There is no contradiction in the comments made by Mr Gibson. You just can’t stand his honesty ’cause you’re used to appeasing those who seek to destroy our community.
Please inform me, Leo Leitch, what positive outcomes have arisen, or might arise from non-specific public negation of the council members that the ratepayers elected Steve Gibson to work with? To achieve anything, and particularly to facilitate change, requires the ability to work with people, to listen, discuss, and likely needs some compromise to reach agreements. What, so far, has Mr Gibson done toward achieve his stated goals? Or was his only true goal to achieve likes on Facebook?
I found nothing positive on his Facebook page, is divisive and short on information and reinforces the notion that he is only on council to cause a fuss and be popular outside council.
People voted for change in all Councils but still the same old s##t – the majority paying for the minority. Change will only occur once the majority have nothing and the minority have anything. Not long now.
I am always open to robust debate, but I will not be caricatured or misrepresented.
My position is simple and one I believe many New Zealanders quietly share. I support equal representation and equal rights for every citizen.
That means decisions about public assets like water should sit with those elected by the whole community, not be divided along lines of ancestry.
That is not extreme. It is not offensive. It is a mainstream view in a modern democracy.
The comment being criticised was a warning about how governance can gradually shift if checks and balances are not maintained. It was not about people. It was about structures and accountability.
Most New Zealanders, including myself, identify first and foremost as New Zealanders. We want a country where everyone is treated the same under the law, where representation is based on votes, and where public resources are managed in the interests of all.
If others want to debate that, I welcome it. But let’s do it honestly, without trying to shut down viewpoints that don’t align with a particular WOKE narrative
Steve Gibson
Woke is good, it means people are awake! And while we talk about everyone being treated the same under the law, a good place to start is how Maori are treated more severely in the criminal justice system.
Better to be AWAKE (woke) than deluded and ignorant. Always cracks me up how “Woke” is used by the minority as some sort of derogatory remark when it’s actually a compliment. Seems some still do not understand the language they speak.
Your comments speak for themselves, Steve. Article contains links to the interview and a transcript of it.
The funniest thing in the transcript is the irony of Steve bleating about being a minority in Council and wanting his minority opinion heeded, whilst similtaneously berating Maori for being a minority and wanting their minority opinion heeded.
Also Steve – care to elaborate on what exactly your problem is with the Me Too movement? Or is it just another “woke” buzz word that you think your voter base will latch onto as a symbol of everything that’s wrong with the world if you shout it loud enough?