By his own account, Lawrence Yule was chastened by the last local body election results in 2007. Running then for a third term, he was surprised to find his two opposition candidates — neither of whom were household names or enjoyed a pre-existing network of support in the community — nonetheless collected 45% of the votes.

His response immediately thereafter was to embrace “sustainability” as the message he heard from the electorate … and to promise that sustainability would be the grand cause of his third term.

Unfortunately for the electorate, what “sustainability” seems to mean to Mayor Yule is the political sustainability of Mayor Yule.

So, to sustain his political career for another term as Hastings Mayor (and hopefully, from his perspective, for another 3-4 terms after that as Uber-Mayor of a new region-wide Unitary Authority), this time Mayor Yule is leaving nothing to chance.

He’s charged out of the gate early.

Mayor Yule realises that Rodney Hide — with his populist finger on the pulse of “Main Street” New Zealand — is threatening to foment a ratepayer revolution against “out of control” local government, and that this revolution might kick butts out in 2010. So, attempting to ride that wave instead of being crushed by it, the Mayor has cast himself as the champion of local government reform here in Hawke’s Bay.

Not only will he carry the torch for amalgamation, he will do us the favour of making it the central cause of his re-election campaign.

Forgive some of us ingrates for not being over-awed by this grand Yulewellian gesture toward the public good. [FYI — according to the Oxford Dictionary, a Yulewellian gesture is one that advances one’s prospects simultaneously at all levels — local and national, personal and public.]

First and foremost, some skeptics might see Mayor Yule’s leadership of such an effort rather like putting the captain (and crew) who rammed the ship into the iceberg in charge of organising the lifeboats to escape. Maybe a fresh team should organise the rescue party.

Second, there are many advocates around the Bay for some sort of local body consolidation, including many who are not current indentured officeholders. Mayor Yule is only one voice … he doesn’t own the issue. Indeed, a clue to his motivation is the fact that he made no effort to bring forward a plan that reflected any kind of considered support from his fellow elected colleagues … either Hastings Councillors or other local body leaders.

Going forward, he will need to earn a leadership role on the issue, not merely assert one.

Third, if the Mayor were truly a champion of local government reform, there are many ways he could press forward right now — not in theory, but in practise — to achieve better, more efficient and more foresightful outcomes in local government operations in Hastings itself, as well as the region. Most of these measures have in fact been far more strongly and consistently — and previously — advocated by others, like Councillor Wayne Bradshaw and the Chamber’s Murray Douglas.

Fourth, and perhaps least important for the moment, are quarrels one might have with the details of Mayor Yule’s version of amalgamation.

For example, if you assumed a goal of amalgamation might be fewer elected officials on the public teat, you’ll be disappointed that the Mayor’s plan only reduces the number of representatives from 37 to 33. Or, more significantly, if you were hoping for a well-considered theory of local responsibilities and accountability, with a rationalisation for which bodies should perform which functions, you won’t find it in this hastily concocted plan, which is more focused on who will sit in which deck chairs.

What explains the Mayor’s sense of urgency about tabling his own personal plan?

Simple … he hears threatening footsteps behind him. He senses the disaffection with his regime. He realises a stronger challenge to his re-election will be mounted in 2010 than ever before. So, he needs to try to point the coming debate to anything other than the past performance of his regime or current bread-and-butter issues. And if that something else has the appearance of grand vision, so much the better.

He will tell us … “The machinery of local government is broken, and who better to fix it than people like me, who understand its intricacies. Now is not the time to change horses or to trust political novices.”

Yeah right!

That spin didn’t work for incumbent Labour against upstart National. We shall see if it works for Lawrence Yule. Maybe he will succeed in distracting voters from real issues and scrutiny of past performance. Maybe he will scare the electorate over change. And maybe he will lure his opposition into quibbling over the fine print of his amalgamation scheme.

Personally, I think the voters will agree with Mayor Yule. “Yes!” they’ll say, “the machinery of local government is broken.” But then, I wager, they’ll ask: “But who broke it?!”

As Mayor Yule has signaled … let the election begin!

Tom Belford

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

  1. Tom, this is the most negative, if not mean-spirited piece I have read for a long time. By attacking Yule you’re playing the man and not the ball. The ball is the issue of restructuring. If you don’t like it kick it for touch. If you don’t like Yule vote him out as team captain. But don’t mix the two.

    Lawrence Yule is the democratically elected leader of the Hastings District, and his just-announced proposal is a commendable initiative to promote public debate on an issue – local body reorganisation – which is of concern to a major section of the public. Tell us what your alternative is, if not the status quo. If this is his ploy to get re-elected then it seems like a thoroughly legitimate one to me. If this isn’t democracy in action then what is?

    There are a lot of people, maybe even a majority, who agree with the Yule concept, if not necessarily the detail. I’m one of them. Good on Lawrence Yule!

  2. Ewan,

    Mean-spirited? Negative?

    Smart politician that he is, Mayor Yule knows better than most people that in politics it is the man (or woman) who gets elected, not the ball. There's nothing mean-spirited in saying that Mayor Yule has an agenda … a "ball" if you will. Sure, I'll follow the ball; but I'll follow the ballplayer too.

    And by the way, when you admonish me: "don't mix the two" … maybe that's advice you should have given the Mayor. Seems to me he's the one who handcuffed himself, purposefully, to the restructuring issue.

    Tom

  3. Boy oh boy. Watch-out anyone who dares to have a different take on things to Tom! For it's patently obvious, Cr Ewan's differing opinion, and right royal, no messing, "forthright" bollocking, made Tom vent his spleen to the extreme! So much so -that one would have to wonder if it is worth offering ones opinion without receiving a severe reprimand from Tom!!

    I used, and liked to believe your site allowed "freedom" of speech. Regardless- you are the bos!

  4. Not a reprimand, Bos, just a counterpunch.

    BayBuzz is open to all comments except the slanderous, those dealing with events that occurred in the last century and ow irrelevant, and those so forelornly repetitive as to threaten to bore readers to death.

    I love comments. Commenters just need to realise that they are walking into a public kitchen, and if they can't take the heat …

    Tom

  5. Good one Tom – exactly as it is. The sooner people wake up to that the better.

    As for Ewan's support: outrageous, considering the council to which he's elected would cease to exist AND with it any "checks and balances" to protect our environment (because that's its – and his – job).

    Why not simply resign now, Ewan? You clearly aren't going to get anything done between now and amalgamation….

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *